DOWNLOAD MOVIES ONLINE

Categories

Archives

Blogroll



eXTReMe Tracker

Asterix and the Vikings movie

The plucky, little Gaul and his lovably oafish sidekick are back for a new adventure presented in glorious 2-D. Asterix (Giamatti) and Obelix (Garrett) are assigned an impossible task: to make a real man out of their Chief’s nephew, Justforkix (Astin) – a soppy young lad who astounds the duo by being a committed vegetarian. Worse still, he couldn’t fight his way out of a day-care centre. His shameless cowardice leads to his abduction by a band of marauding Vikings, whose bogus sorcerer Cryptograf has convinced them those who feel fear have the power to fly. Asterix and Obelix are soon hot on their trail, while Justforkix finds himself falling for Abba (Wood), the Viking Chief’s girl power daughter.

At a time when CG animations are becoming far too cynical and over-reliant upon snide gags from Saturday Night comedians, there’s something pleasingly old-fashioned about these warm-hearted cartoon heroes whose goofy puns and gentle satire have been a staple of French cinema since the sixties. Asterix and Obelix remain delightful characters, but sadly, for all the good will they engender, this film is unremarkable, modestly entertaining at best. Fjeldmark and Møller’s vibrant, colourful images ensure this is the slickest-looking Asterix cartoon yet, but screenwriter Jean-Luc Goossens makes the mistake of sidelining the two heroes. It didn’t work in the live action Mission: Cleopatra (2002) – where Gerard Depardieu’s illness forced the filmmakers to focus on the supporting cast – and it doesn’t work here. The film drags whenever Asterix and Obelix aren’t onscreen and the love story between callow, young Justforkix and endearing, gap-toothed Abba fails to compensate.

All the familiar, reoccurring gags are present and still raise a smile: Cacophonix’ horrendous singing, Obelix’ gargantuan feasts, the pirate ship that gets sunk over and over again, and Gauls charging into battle to whack the Romans into orbit. Some neat touches include Justforkix’ pigeon cell-phone and Viking maiden named Ikea with a taste for looting furniture, but the screenplay lacks the buoyant wit and surreal inventiveness of series’ highpoint The Twelve Tasks of Asterix (1976) and Fjeldmark’s earlier, overlooked Help, I’m a Fish! (2000). An unfortunate abundance of Euro-pop cover Eye of the Tiger are likely to induce a few cringes. When Justforkix introduces the fun-loving Gaul’s to disco, it’s as embarrassing as dad dancing at your birthday party. Worse still, Celine Dion warbles the closing song.

Click here to watch movie trailer or download movie now


Assault on Precinct 13 movie

The idea of remaking a John Carpenter movie seems almost sacrilegious. Oh sure the guy is no Coppola or Scorsese, but in the world of genre pictures and purely entertaining B-movies there really isn’t anyone with as solid or fun track record as Carpenter, especially during the height of his career in the 80’s. For all their cheesy techno music and hair, films like “The Thing”, “Big Trouble in Little China”, “The Fog”, “Escape from New York” and “Halloween” still work just as superbly today as they ever did.

If there’s one thing distinctive about his films though, it was that he came up with such interesting high concepts for movies that sadly - more often than not - didn’t have the budget behind them to execute those ideas as well as they should’ve been. Now comes along “Assault on Precinct 13″, the first of several remakes/sequels to Carpenter’s early efforts that are in the works at present. The result? Pretty good in fact.

Like the recent “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” or “Dawn of the Dead”, “Assault” is one of those remakes that whilst not being the genre defining film that its predecessor was, it’s still a perfectly servicable movie in its own right that’s quite enjoyable and on a production level a lot better looking than the 70’s low budget originator. Make no mistake, the first film was far from being one of Carpenter’s best or most popular films, and this is by no means a great remake or clever reinvention as such.

What it is though is a perfectly decent little action thriller with a hard edge of violence and a solid cast that’s head and shoulders better than the utter shite they’ve released throughout the rest of ths month. French director Jean-Francois Richet deliver some interesting shots and writer James DeMonaco sets up the idea of the ‘cops killing cops & crims’ storyline well, but neither are exactly great filmmakers so the tension level that was so pervasive in the original never really takes off here.

One thing this has over the original is stars with Ethan Hawke doing a much better job than his recent shite in “Taking Lives”, and Laurence Fishburne channeling a slightly darker Morpheus style performance as a crime kingpin. Drea DeMatteo, Viola Davis and Brian Dennehy all have great supporting parts that are stock characters but fun ones nonetheless. Not faring so well are Gabriel Byrne as the all too dull villain, Maria Bello as an utter airhead of a shrink, and John Leguizamo as a truly annoying junkie.

It may lack in suspense, but it makes up for it in violence. “Assault” isn’t a brutal film but it is harsh - characters are summarily and coldly executed, people die quite unexpectedly and there’s a lot of gunplay to go around. The last 20 minutes or so however screws the pooch a little as things are moved from the confines of the police station to the surrounding snow-bound woods. The resulting face-offs that most of the film has been building too unfortunately feel anti-climactic and let the whole effort down slightly.

Still, whilst its a far from perfect action flick, its still a pretty solid one and certainly a surprise for a time of year when dreck like “Elektra” and “Racing Stripes” rule the roost. This is one assault that’s far from indecent.

Click here to watch movie trailer or download movie now


Assassins movie

When killer-for-hire Robert Rath (Sylvester Stallone) allows his victim to shoot himself rather than die by Rath’s bullet, he knows something is wrong. There’s more: fiery upstart Miguel Bain (Antonio Banderas) wants to be the No. 1 assassin, and he keeps offing Rath’s marks just before Rath can. Is Rath losing his edge? This is your classic Hitman in Midlife Crisis genre film which should appeal to most sensitive New Age guys. On what he swears to be his last job, Rath is supposed to terminate the purveyor of stolen software, Electra (Julianne Moore), but sparks fly (sort of) and off they sweep in a trail of bodies, Bain in pursuit.

Stallone’s thick good looks are lasting into middle age, but he still comes across as a lug, and not a particularly charming one. His persona, probably intended to be one of cool nerves of steel, comes off as ponderous and slightly dim-witted. At least Swarzenegger looks like he’s having a good time in his movies. Banderas, on the other hand, is such a whacked-out ball of perspiration and intensity here that he is never believable as anything but a crazed chewer of scenery.

As dismissible, hackneyed and predictable as this film is, there is still some fun to be had. Julianne Moore (”Nine Months,” “Safe”) doesn’t belong here, but interestingly, she presents an action character just waiting for a good movie. In the hands of a director less interested in gratuitous splash and shock (Richard Donner), she could really drive a film. The camera loves her face, and she brings an inventive quirkiness that survives the awful writing.

There is some computer fun here, too. As the world gets wired, we’re seeing more and more net and web shenanigans on film. Apple Computer clearly underwrote this movie: Alongside the detachable silencer, the Powerbook emerges as a necessary tool for any prospective globe-trotting hit-person.

Click here to watch movie trailer or download movie now


The Assassination of Richard Nixon movie

  • Author: admin
  • Filed under: Drama
  • Date: Jan 31,2008

A piece of the American nightmare. For his first full-length film, Niels Mueller strikes precisely and hard. Behind the portrait of an ordinary loser who, due to humiliations and disappointments, decides to hijack a plane and crash it into the White House, The Assassination of Richard Nixon delivers a harsh and cruel vision of American society, carried from beginning to end by the masterful Sean Penn.

February 1974: Watergate is getting ready to crash on President Nixon. A man shaves in his car. Close shots on a revolver, a briefcase, and some envelopes; he hides a gun in an artificial limb and heads towards the airport. In a voice-over, he addresses orchestra leader Leonard Bernstein, to whom he tells his story, which is recorded on tapes. Flashback to one year earlier. Sam Bicke has just found a job as an office furniture salesman. He splits his life between his work, his impromptu and awkward visits to his wife (from whom he is separated but would like to reconquer), and Bonny, a mechanic with whom he dreams of starting his own business.

At the moment where the film opens on Sam Bicke’s confession, one finds him at the end of a slow but inescapable process of destruction in which he will do his utmost to detail all the stages. At this last stage of his miserable course, Sam Bicke shows himself as determined, thoughtful, critical and lucid. Even terrifying, since he builds a speech aimed at showing that a grain of sand (sic), i.e. less than nothing, someone anonymous, can exist in the space of a few minutes in the eyes of the world, while attacking the most powerful man in the country. Sam Bicke doesn’t come to foment such a project gratuitously.

All of Mueller’s film delivers the elements that make this ordinary man a potential assassin. Moreover, he is found one year earlier showing a total lack of self-confidence, the opposite of a solitary terrorist. All the areas of his life help to wipe out his chances and his will to succeed. His wife, indifferent, distant, deprived of compassion, keeps him at a distance to rebuild a family with another; his brother only shows him contempt and treats him like a liar and a swindler, whereas the television news strives to show a Nixon driven to the edge and forced, just like him, to constantly justify himself.

The parallel between Sam and the president functions like a game of mirrors. The ordinary citizen, who aspires only to a better life that the American dream can offer, identifies with the most important personality of the United States. Moreover, Sam’s boss compares his job to what Nixon exerts (re-elected into 1972 thanks to the same campaign promises of the previous campaign that he did not even keep), in which success (selling his merchandise) necessarily passes through a lie, in one of these many restaurant scenes which are transformed into interrogation or humiliation sessions. In the same way, this average employee who dreams of liberating himself from his modern chains knows that he can only exist with a name. Just like his brother Julius, a garage owner, he will only receive recognition by launching his own business. The subtlety of the script pushes irony even in his name, in a scene where his associate’s son calls him “Uncle Sam”. In the space of one innocent moment, he bears the same name as the nation.

And yet Sam never manages to convince his public (his associate, brother, boss, wife, himself) : constantly posing, all while trying to maintain a part of his integrity, on his face he keeps the image of a loser. Witness the scene where in front of his mirror he unconvincingly tries to introduce himself : « Hi, I’m Sam Bicke ». Even he doesn’t really believe it, notably when he presents himself as a confident businessman in front of a banker whom he asks for a loan, or when he assures his wife that he is in control of his own life. It’s a question of faith in The Assassination of Richard Nixon.

Those who represent power define themselves by their aptitude for deceiving their world (Sam’s boss, Nixon, the banker) and those who advocate for truth remain on the sidelines. As if solitude were the corollary to sincerity. Even in regards to an oppresed group like the Black Panthers, Sam bangs against a wall of incomprehension, making himself look ridiculous. Redemption can only come from himself. The film doesn’t tell anything other than the story of a man who doesn’t know how to find and play his own role in a society that has no pity for the mediocre or the weak, despite hope and will. A man who just wanted to exist, but didn’t know how to resist.

Click here to watch movie trailer or download movie now


Ask the Dust movie

  • Author: admin
  • Filed under: Drama, Romance
  • Date: Jan 31,2008

“Ask the Dust” returns writer/director Robert Towne to his favorite golden Los Angeles period locales, this time to expand on John Fante’s adored Depression Era novel. While the film tends to get stuck in first gear too often, the highly sexual lead performances by Salma Hayek and Colin Farrell are more than enough to engage the viewer.

Depression Era writer Arturo Bandini (Colin Farrell) has moved to Los Angeles to find inspiration beyond his destitution and failing health. At a local café, he meets a Mexican waitress named Camilla (Salma Hayek), and is immediately smitten, but shows his attraction through rude behavior. Fortunately, Camilla is enchanted by Arturo’s baffling ways and the two begin an affair that, for him, provides the muse he’s looking for, and for her, the distraction she needs.

An adaptation of the celebrated novel by John Fante, “Ask the Dust” returns writer/director Robert Towne back to his “Chinatown” roots. The filmmaker is back in dreamy old Los Angeles, depicting a golden time of growth encrusted with a rotting population of dreamers. Towne employs cinematographer Caleb Deschanel to cover the sandy terrain with luscious detail and, when all else fails, the picture looks flawless, providing terrific era detail to backdrop the story.

It’s easy to see what tickled Towne about this story. “Dust” features two protagonists who are completely unlikable, thus providing some faint spark to the flaccid story, and handing the actors an unusual amount of character meat to chew on. Towne takes great delight in setting Arturo and Camilla up through a series of events at the café where they engage in a war of humiliation, leading to their unlikely coupling. Farrell and Hayek provide the right sparkle of attraction between the two characters, and they sell the dodgy romance very well, especially when Towne has troubling maintaining clarity during the courtship. Towne aims for steam, and with these two talents, that’s not hard to achieve.

After the flirting has subsided, “Dust” starts to rev down and embrace classical melodrama in ways that do not enhance the story. Because the novel’s overall arc has been pared down to a more manageable size by Towne, the film lacks the necessary moves to explore the emotional growth for Arturo, who seems to become some kind of grand, compassionate knight in a very short time. The rhythms of Los Angeles are lost in the final act, with Towne caught up in sudsy romantic yearnings, and losing the raw immediacy that made the characters come together. The relationship dissolves into tedium, and “Dust” lumbers to a sludgy climax.

Still, what Towne has here is another rich evocation of a time long forgotten (his specialty), and anytime Farrell and Hayek decide to play up their sexuality, that’s cause to dance in the streets. “Ask the Dust” is a deeply flawed film, but it’s intoxicating enough to sustain the experience.

Click here to watch movie trailer or download movie now


As Good as It Gets movie

Not only one of the best romantic comedies of the year, but one of the best films in ages - “As Good as it Gets” certainly lives up to its title. With a truckload of cynical laughs and some compelling emotional moments, .

The performances are truly great all around, Jack Nicholson gives a career highlight performance as the obsessive-compulsive ‘Melvin’ who’s totally upfront and somewhat . Rarely does the two romantic leads match each other in quality, but Helen Hunt plays her best role yet making her character likable, funny, intelligent and emotional.

Greg Kinnear puts in a surprising and enjoyable performance as ‘Simon’, a gay artist and neighbour who puts up with Melvin’s insults (which fly thick and fast) and like the leads is both funny and emotionally real. Cuba Gooding Jr. does excellent work with his few minutes of screen time, playing a gay art dealer who sells Simon’s work and stands up to Melvin whenever he puts Simon down - a guy full of assertiveness and realism that is very rarely given to any gay film characters.

All the remaining supporting roles are enjoyable, ranging from Shirley Knight as Carol’s excitable mother who just exudes cheerfulness, Yeardley Smith in a brief but funny cameo (always liked her), and of course the scene-stealer being Verdell who is quite simply the cutest and funniest dog I’ve ever seen in a movie.

The character-driven script is extremely intelligent, the plot is a bit thin but the pacing is fast and there rarely comes any dull moments. It also doesn’t fall into the boring ’schmaltzy’ last half hour as so many romantic comedies do, and in fact takes an audacious step by running around 50 minutes longer than most.

Any faults? Well there really isn’t any particular scenes that stick in one’s memory (eg. the “When Harry met Sally” restaurant-orgasm scene), there are some points where the film drags but quickly picks up again - the best example coming early on involving Kinnear drawing a sketch of Skeet Urlich’s character and then being beaten by a gang of robbers.

The unpleasantness of the moment though is lifted by a very funny scene in the hospital involving Kinnear, Gooding Jr. & Smith. “As Good as it Gets” is definitely one of the best films of 1997, and though it just misses becoming a ‘classic film, it’s still thoroughly entertaining and you’ll leave the cinema with a very warm and content feeling.

Click here to watch movie trailer or download movie now


Artificial Intelligence: AI movie

In spite of the scientific coldness of its title, A.I., far from being a fortifying technological demonstration, is rather a fairy tale for adults with a child at its center.

In a not far off future, Haley Joel Osment plays David, a unique robot of his kind since he was programmed to love. Placed with a family to replace their sick son, David tries to gain the love of his adoptive mother. But when their son returns home cured, cohabitation becomes difficult and the mother grudgingly finds herself abandoning David in the forest. David thus has only one goal, to find the blue fairy which, following the example Pinocchio, will transform him into a real child in order to gain the reciprocal maternal love which he lacks.

The film is made up of three quite distinct parts. In the first, David tries to assimilate in a human family, while in the second part we follow his adventures during his search, until finally in the third part, he confronts his dream.

The first segment is without any doubt the most psychological since it shows the cat and mouse game between David and his mother Monica (Frances O’ Connor) where maternal love is at stake. David then develops an obsessive and intrusive behavior at the limits of sordid harassment. However the child gradually succeeds in gaining affection, stronger than what one might have for a pet or toy. If it were not for the return of “the prodigal son”, the robot could almost manage to become a member of the family. In those moments reality dangerously flirts with the virtual, and Spielberg clearly shows the threat that artificial intelligence represents for the human race.

David is then abandoned, thus moving into the second part of the film: the adventures of a young robot discovering the world (”David In Wonderland”) and the director’s light satire of American society. Starting with the abandonment of the pets, it seems to be the rage if one only looks at the number of former pet crocodiles and snakes that swarm in the muddy water of L.A’s river. David’s abandonment demonstrates the saturation of American consumer society where everything becomes disposable and interchangeable, once the trend is past. One also discovers a circus where the robots are publicly sacrificed, somewhere halfway between the topic of the Holocaust (Schindler’s List) and that of gladiators (Gladiator produced by Dreamworks, his production company). If the references are openly obvious, this circus reflects a modern day spectacle popular in America where an ecstatic crowd contemplates gigantic robotic trucks clashing and being destroyed. And if you look closely at these spectators, you see that they are very well the same as those onscreen.

David then meets robot Gigolo Joe (the excellent Jude Law), a superman whose only goal, obviously, is to satisfy women. He seems to be a direct reference to the increasingly significant phenomenon of unmarried and independent women who do not need men to survive (i.e. the success of Sex In The City). Gigolo Joe then brings the child to the red city, a town of a thousand lights where vice reigns, an obvious transposition of Las Vegas. Both then go to Doctor Know, a sort of fast-food of knowledge where you can ask any question of a computer found in a type of peep show. Spielberg denounces a certain toppling of American cultural levels where chains like Barnes & Noble and Blockbuster have the monopoly on pre-chewed culture for the masses. The problem it is that with films like Jurassic Park, the filmmaker already has one foot inside the beast. He benefits from it nevertheless to make a sly wink at Stanley Kubrick’s 2001 with his computer. Another problem of this second segment is the facility with which our protagonists get out of each perilous situation, which demonstrates a sometimes idling, botched script.

Finally, David and Gigolo Joe arrive at their destination, there where the blue fairy is found. Much was said about the fact that A.I. was originally Stanley Kubrick’s project and he later entrusted it to Spielberg in order to work on Eyes Wide Shut. Kubrick’s presence is felt only during a few minutes in this last act and principally in an alarming scene of rage. It is at this moment that one understands that this is very well a Spielberg film and not Kubrick’s work. There where the latter would have probably opted for a logically cruel and somber end, Spielberg, by the improbable wave of a magic wand, turns toward the fairy tale in order to save the situation. The director reminds us that he is the author of E.T. and Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and returns to known territory. The presence of a cute bear throughout the film only confirms this sentiment. If this conclusion proves to be charming, the denouement or moral of the story calls into question the purpose of such a film. Spielberg proclaims that it is love that makes a human, which was known from the very start, since it was the object of David’s search.

As for the production, it’s careful and alive without, however, stunning us with useless special effects. Especially striking is the acting. Haley Joel Osment easily shifts between a cold machine, a child in love, and a dangerously obsessed creature while Jude Law shines onscreen as an extroverted gigolo. Frances O’Connor also aptly shows the ambivalence of her feelings.

With A.I. Artificial Intelligence, Spielberg signs an ambitious and engrossing film but paradoxically with a somewhat vain focus. A film to be seen nevertheless, quite superior to Saving Private Ryan and dinosaurs.

Click here to watch movie trailer or download movie now